Skip to content

#1: “Turn” by Fran Healy

May 17, 2011

Listen to or buy the song.

Intro [section A]:

The four-measure intro is structurally regular and harmonically simple, even naïve.  It presents no anomalies that might need to be counterbalanced or assimilated over the course of the piece.



The bass plays even 8th notes on the I and the V; a resonant tonic E chord occurs squarely on the downbeat; the lead guitar part, in inverted 5ths like the bass line, rises from and returns to the tonic.  Broad and accessible (if perhaps non-committal), a determined, expansive andante, this section presents the song in miniature.

It also introduces two motifs.

Motif α:  Something powerful, confined, and monolithic occurs, followed by a softer, more human, cantabile part

This “Hesitation” motif is found in the intro, where the lead guitar “gets out of the way” of the resonant E major chord before beginning.  It is also found in the melody of the verse.  Note the rests at the beginning of each measure, and the stammering effect created by the unusual sixteenth rests in measure four.


Additionally, Motif α is suggested in the relationship between the punchier section A and the adjacent, more expansive section B.  In section D, the vocals finally, boldly enter on the 1, proclaiming the title lyric.  In repetitions of the lyric, all hesitation is done away with, as “turn” enthusiastically comes in before the 1:



Motif β:  A tendency towards growth

“Growth” can heard in the vocal melody’s tendency to rise both dynamically and melodically over sections B-C-D (verse-prechorus-chorus).  The melody of section B has a range of B2-B3;  in section C, the range is B3-F#4;  in section D, the range is A3-A4.

Motif β can be found in the intro, which contains an ascending lead guitar line, and which grows through the drums’ entrance in measure three.

Lyrics:

Many of the lyrics reinforce the harmonic naïveté of the intro section by both suggesting genuine innocence…

I want to see what people saw 

So where’s the stars? [sic]

Up in the sky

And what’s the moon?

A big balloon

 …And by wishing for a return to innocence, from an implied adult perspective:

I want to feel forever young

With the same broad brush as the overall piece, the lyrics suggest an inexperienced or sheltered speaker summoning the boldness to go out and break new ground:

We’ll never know unless we grow

There’s so much world outside the door

Commentary:

In its presentation of the thrill of moving from childlike hesitation to soaring, courageous presence, “Turn” achieves a unity of message and form.  By ending with an extended restatement of section A, the song underlines the notion that one can explore the “world outside the door” without leaving behind the serenity found at home (“home” being the familiar tonic drone of the intro).

The song could be criticized for passing on certain development opportunities in favor of restating the familiar.  For example, as an uplifting piece that utilizes the metaphor of singing, there might be a powerful, climatic vocal section sung without words, perhaps drawn as an inversion of the elegant downward shape of the section D melody.  Where this moment would be most likely to occur, after the ascending section E (the “we’ve got to turn” bridge) we instead get a sparse, vocals-free iteration of section D.

Another passed-on opportunity arises from this moment in the second iteration of section C:

The melody softly descends at “sing my song” to G#3, where before it was belted on the F#4.  This suggests a counter-current of “Restraint” to the “Growth” of motif β.  Alas, the piece eschews the complex task of integrating an additional idea in favor of its perfectly effective wide-eyed universality.

5 Comments leave one →
  1. Juan permalink
    May 19, 2011 11:38 am

    Hey! hah, i have one that u might find amusing : ) here it is, pure mainstream; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=929sn1qMCcM

    to be honest im more interested in the psychological meaning of it, as im more of an introspection fanatic than much of a musician, and i think there’s something really deep to this song, tho it appears as a comedic portrail of the modern club scene, i think there’s a profound unconscious metaphor hidden in this, ‘orphan tears’, -my main clue; these represent a sad child without parents –

    Quite twisted, i hope u find it interesting, if you to and have any thoughts id be interested in hearing them… :D enjoy.

    • Gv permalink*
      May 19, 2011 2:54 pm

      Hi Juan. Thanks for reading. I only listened to “Orphan Tears” once, but here’s what came to mind:

      Despite continuous hallucinogenic tangents, the objective events portrayed in this song are straightforward and confined: Three separate narrators drink something called “Orphan Tears” inside a night club. The setting is important here. It (its toilets, its dance floor, etc.) is the constant elaborated upon in their hallucinations. Every character in this narrative is a night club denizen. The central action: drug ingestion.

      The well-known ACE Study by Robert F. Anda, MD, MS, and Vincent J. Felitti, MD analyzed the relationship between multiple categories of childhood trauma and health and behavioral outcomes later in life. Adverse Childhood Experiences covered in the study include parental (or primary caregiver) neglect, physical abuse, verbal abuse, and exposure to mental illness or drug abuse. The study found that, with a high degree of reliability, youths who experienced more Adverse Childhood Experiences would be more likely to abuse drugs and alcohol and engage in promiscuous sex later in life. The song rings true because of its revelatory renaming of night club alcohol to “Orphan’s Tears.” The tears the night club patrons drink are their own; they are wasted “orphans,” many of them, the products of neglectful or abusive parenting, or they wouldn’t have been drawn to the club. Much of the video’s imagery supports this interpretation, such as a nightmarish cameo by “America’s Dad” Bill Cosby and a direct portrayal of the narrators as crying babies — wounded children — which, according to the ACE Study, they likely were.

  2. declan mcdonnell permalink
    June 3, 2011 3:53 am

    Hello I read your commentary on ‘turn’ and found it fascinating. The question is could/would you apply the same sort of objectivity to an unsigned band? the link to my band’s myspace page is http://www.myspace.com/heydaymusic We would love to hear a talented muso’s opinion of our music. if you would be willing to do it please email me and i will most certainly read your thoughts on whatever song you choose:) happy listening!
    ps if you like bands like travis,u2,killers,snow patrol,radiohead then u really might like our stuff

    • Gv permalink*
      June 4, 2011 2:57 pm

      Sure! Who cares whether or not a band is signed, if the craftsmanship is there? I have a few other pieces in my queue, but I’ll take a listen to your music and think about writing up something.

      • Declan mcdonnell permalink
        June 6, 2011 3:06 am

        Appreciate it sir. Look forward to the musical autopsy;)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.